The President Of 9/11

Font SIZE : Tichy : Small : Medium : Large

USA Fighter pilots do not need Presidential Orders to shoot down a potential threat. If the potential threat refuses to follow the fighter to a safe landing site. The fighter pilot faces a Court Martial if he fails to shoot down the potential threat. He has no airy-fairy options. He must protect America. Why else would his country give him a Seventy-Million-Dollar-Flying-Gun?

 There were no fighter pilot's called up from USA bases to intercept the alleged hijack jets on 9/11. If there had been the pilot's would have seen the "jetliners" were empty drones painted in airline colours. The President's hijack Fairy Tale falls further apart when you examine US Air Defense Standing Orders:  A sufficient (classified) number of fighter interceptors to protect the USA must be on 10 minutes ground-to-air standby at all times. If this doesn't happen Court Martial's happen. That is the Law. Or at least it was until George W. Bush became President. In June 2001 the rules of automatic intercepts were changed to suit the President's (classified) requirements.
Before Bush changed procedures - the Law was activated 129 times in 2000 and 67 times between Jan & June 2001.
If the normal, pre Bush, procedures had been followed on 9/11 all four alleged hi-jacked jets would have been intercepted, forcibly escorted to  safe landing sites, as was the usual procedure, or shot down.
Six years on media presenters who are obviously born cowards continue parroting the ridiculous Bush version of  9/11 when Bush is universally despised by every thinking person on the planet.bcdefghijklmnl

'SIZE : Tichy : Small : Medium : Large

The terrorist ruining World Peace is not an Army-less Navy-less Air Force-less Arab in a cave. The Real Terrorist is the coward in the White House who Deserted from the rich kids funk hole his Daddy found him in the Texas Guard. Little George went missing after it became apparent he would never learn to fly. Daddy Bush had arranged for little George to have flying lessons on a plane that was being withdrawn from service in Vietnam. So even if he had had the brains to comprehend flying lessons there was no danger of little George ever facing those nasty Vietcong. When he was declared unfit for flying lessons little George could have been shipped out to Nam as a clerk. He ran away. Daddy made certain the Military Police didn't seek him out.
.
    SIZE : Tichy : Small : Medium : Large .  . .
.



The Real Terrorists Growing Fat On War Profits


In the Gulf War, 1991, waves of air strikes obliterated Iraq's stockpiles of banned chemical weapons supplied by President Regan and Her Majesty The Queen via their arms sales teams, Vice President George Bush, Senior, (now Knight of the Grand Cross) & Defense Secretary Rumsfeld. Prime Minister Mrs. Thatcher (now Baroness) & Defence Minister Heseltine (now Lord). 
To penetrate Iraq's chemical ammo dumps depleted uranium ammunition made from nuclear waste was used (Dirty Ammo or DU).  Dust created by uranium ammunition cripples the immune system. This is diagnosed as uranium poisoning or radiation sickness and generally known as Gulf War Syndrome.
The 2003 edition of Encyclopedia Britannica's Almanac confirmed 325,000 of the 1991 Gulf War veterans were receiving compensation for service-related disabilities.
Sixteen-thousand US troops and six-hundred British troops who served in the 1991 (two-month-long) Gulf War had died a slow death of Gulf War Syndrome.
This horrendous own goal should have stopped "the powers that be" using nuclear waste as ammunition (DU). Instead; they increased DU production and distribution in the certain knowledge that it kills the troops who use it!?
January 2008 Her Majesty The Queen and her business partner Mr Bush continue to deny there is any such thing as Gulf War Syndrome! This undeniable, premeditated and ongoing, treasonous mass murder of their own troops can only be described as satanic greed.
Her Majesty The Queen inherited investments in African and Australian uranium mines now worth around $6 Billion. Since the mid 1950's Her Majesty has invested, through the usual nominees Rothschilds et al, at least as much in uranium (nuclear) weapons. Her Majesties cousins the Bush family have likewise, through cut-outs, acquired massive stakes in uranium weapons production.
The illegal occupation of Iraq, 2003, began with laser guided DU missiles served-up at a Baghdad restaurant followed by another 200 tons of DU "Shock & Awe" raining down on the city. By September 2007 over 2,000 tons of DU had been exploded in Iraq and over 30,000 coalition troops had been invalided out of Iraq.
How many are dying of uranium (DU) poisoning?
Only time will tell.
What we do know is; the "powers that be" intend to use criminally contrived "anti terror laws" to make it illegal for anyone to seek such information.
Who said the Fourth Reich would never happen?
   .  
.
By September 2007 over 2,000 tons of DU had been exploded in Iraq and over 30,000 coalition troops had been invalided out of Iraq. How many are dying of uranium (DU) poisoning? Only time will tell. What we do know is; the "powers that be" intend to use criminally contrived "anti terror laws" to make it illegal for anyone to seek such information.

SIZE : Tichy : Small : Medium : Large
ghjklopgt
STRONG POISON
Plutonium (Plute) is a silver-gray TRANS-URANIUM ELEMENT found in very small quantities in nature with uranium ores.
Plute was first produced artificially by Glenn Seaborg in 1940.
Plute is now produced for nuclear weapons by burning uranium in nuclear power stations (the waste from this process is made into DU or Dirty Ammo - shells, bullets and bombs).
Six pounds of Plute destroyed the entire City of Nagasaki. Apart from its explosive "qualities" Plute is also an everlasting FATAL POISON.
By 1979 the Nuclear Apologists Club had already produced more than enough Plute to split the Earth into brick sized lumps.
Who? but a lunatic would advocate producing anymore?
By building their new plute stations - ten in Great Britain and one-hundred in America, the Queen and the "pro-life" President will intentionally, massively, increase uranium poison induced abortions, miscarriages, birth defects, early deaths from nuclear cancers of the brain, throat, chest & stomach - and the heart breaking misery these things bring - in the British and American workforce.
The same $Trillions invested in sea-power and solar-power systems would make the world a healthier, safer place, and save untold $Trillions of Tax Dollars in the future; simply by not producing nuclear waste (which has to stored for thousands of years at the taxpayers expense) and give the UK and USA safe, clean, cheap, reliable electricity supplies.
Making life better for ordinary people, however, is the opposite of everything the Bush/Royal warmongers cabal stand for.

December 13, 2007 Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11 Investigation by Alan Miller http://www.opednews.com/

SIZE : Tichy : Small : Medium : Large

Hundreds of senior government engineers and scientists have now formally rejected the Bush account of 9/11.
“The official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible,” said Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD. 
Col. Bowman flew over 100 combat missions in Viet Nam as a fighter pilot. He then became Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology.  Having gained doctorate degrees in both Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, he then  served as Director of Advanced Space Programs Development.
Col. Bowman has been studying the 9/11 cover-up and who exactly put out the patently false "Arab hijack" stories in the first place? He concludes.
"I think the case is pretty clear that it’s highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney.” [1]

Doctor of Physics David Griscom, spent 33 years at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C. He is a Fellow of the American Physical Society.  Griscom states.  “I implore my fellow physicists and engineers who have supercomputer access to get to work on the physics of the World Trade Center collapses and publish their findings in refereed journals.
The consequences of continued public ignorance is more than sufficient motivation for any physicist or engineer to help expose the real perpetrators of 9/11.” [2] 

Retired Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Dr. Joel Hirschhorn, PhD, served as Director of Environment, Energy and Natural Resources. 
He has testified before Congress on technology, science, and environmental issues on more than 50 occasions. Earlier this year, he wrote.
“Analyses reveal the demise of the WTC was not caused by airplanes. Like many other groups, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth [5] wants an honest and comprehensive study of the evidence. The primary task to determine once and for all what destroyed the WTC has never even been approached. Speaking as a former engineering professor we must first, let the technical truth speak for itself. We must not allow the Bush lies to continue any longer.'[3]

Another senior Federal engineer Enver Masud, MS, PE, an expert in electrical power grid management  and former Chief of the Strategic and Emergency Planning Branch, U.S. Department of Energy.  Has written
“The major conclusions of the 9/11 Commission Report are false. Among its many problems; The FBI have admitted there never was any evidence that Bin Laden was involved  in 9/11.
To this day, the hijackers' identities have never been established.
It is entirely silent on the collapse of WTC 7 . 
The lack of bodies or aircraft parts, at both the Pentagon and Shanksville flatly contradicts the Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice accounts of Flights 77 and 93.
There is prima facie evidence of the controlled demolition of the WTC .”

Dr. James Quintiere, PhD, one of the world’s leading fire science researchers and safety engineers and former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),  has publicly called for an independent review of NIST’s account of the demise of the World Trade Center.
Dr. Quintiere made his plea last June at the World Fire Safety Conference during his presentation, “Questions on the WTC Investigations.” Referring to the NIST report he said. “I wish that there would be a peer review of this.”
Dr. Quintiere also expressed his frustration at  NIST’s failure to provide any explanation at all for the third skyscraper that was destroyed on 9/11, World Trade Center Building 7.  He encouraged his audience of fellow researchers and engineers to re-examine the Bush account of  9/11. [4],

Dwain Deets, MS is the former Director of Aerospace Projects at NASA .
Deets served at NASA for 37 years. In support of the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth he writes. “The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind controlled explosions were involved in the destruction of the World Trade Center.”[6]

Edward S. Munyak, MS, PE, has over 20 years experience as a Fire Protection Engineer for the U.S. Departments of Energy & Defense.
He advises the D.O.E., on Fire Protection for Nuclear Facilities. A Licensed Professional Mechanical Engineer and Fire Protection Engineer in the State of California, Mr. Munyak currently serves as Fire Protection Engineer for the city of San Jose, California, the 10th largest city in the United States.
In his presentation at the World Fire Safety Conference, June 4, 2007, Munyak writes. “The collapse of WTC 1, 2 & 7 were not caused by fire effects. ... The official reports are politically driven."
The architects and engineers petition reads,
“We believe that there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore that the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened ”[7]
For more information about the petition, please visit the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth website, http://www.AE911Truth.org/joinus.php
notes
[1] Video recording of speech by Col. Robert Bowman, PhD Sept. 11, 2004 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6900065571556128674
[2] "Hand Waving" the Physics of 9/11 by David Griscom, PhD Jan. 5, 2007 http://impactglassman.blogspot.com/
[3] Painful 9/11 Truth by Joel Hirschhorn, PhD Sept. 4, 2007 http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/09/04/143308.php
[4] Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation by Alan Miller Aug. 21, 2007 http://www.opednews.com/
articles/genera_alan_mil_070820_former_chief_of_nist.htm 
[5] Architects and Engineers Petition to Reinvestigate 9/11 Signed by More Than 230 Architects and Engineers 2007 http://www.ae911truth.org/joinus.php
[6] Statement by Dwain Deets, MS, in support of Architects and Engineers petition November, 2007 http://www.ae911truth.org/profile.php?uid=998819
[7] Presentation at the 2007 National Fire Protection Association World Fire Safety Conference, by Edward S. Munyak.
Critically important questions about 9/11 still remain unanswered six years after the terrible events of that day. As the above statements of senior government engineers and scientists demonstrate, the need for a new thorough, and independent investigation of 9/11 is not a matter of partisan politics.  It is a matter of the utmost importance for America’s security and the future of the entire world. see http://patriotsquestion911.com/
Federal Engineers Want 9/11 Reinvestigated
Additional information on skeptics of the official account of 9/11 can be found in Alan Miller's other articles on this subject below.

Dec. 4, 2007 - Eight Senior Republican Appointees Challenge Official Account of 9/11 - “Not Possible”, “a Whitewash”, “False” featured statements by
Paul Craig Roberts, PhD, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Ronald Reagan
Catherine Austin Fitts, Assistant Secretary of Housing under President George H.W. Bush
Morgan Reynolds, PhD, Chief Economist of the U.S. Department of Labor under current President George W. Bush
Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret), Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan
Mary Schiavo, JD, Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Transportation under Presidents George H.W. Bush and William Clinton
Barbara Honegger, Special Assistant to the Chief Domestic Policy Adviser to President Ronald Reagan and White House Policy Analyst
Edward Peck, Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism under President Ronald Reagan. Former Deputy Coordinator, Covert Intelligence Programs at the U.S. State Department. Former U.S. Ambassador and Chief of Mission in Iraq
Morton Goulder, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under Presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter
Sept. 23, 2007 - Seven CIA Veterans Challenge 9/11 Commission Report - Official Account of 9/11 a “Joke” and a “Cover-up” featured statements by CIA veterans Raymond McGovern, William Christison, Melvin Goodman, Robert Baer, Robert David Steele, Lynne Larkin, and David MacMichael.
Sept. 5, 2007 - U.S. Navy 'Top Gun' Pilot Questions 9/11, featured the statement of Commander Ralph Kolstad, U.S. Navy ‘Top Gun’ pilot.
Sept. 4, 2007 - Former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment Senior Staff Member Calls for New Investigation of 9/11 featured the statement of Joel S. Hirschhorn, Ph.D., who served for 12 years as a Senior Staff Member of the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and later as Director of Environment, Energy and Natural Resources for the National Governors Association.
Aug. 27, 2007 - National Academy of Sciences Member Calls for New 9/11 Investigation featured the statement of Lynn Margulis, Ph.D., world renowned scientist.
Aug. 21, 2007 - Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation featured the statement of James Quintiere, Ph.D., one of the world's leading fire science researchers.
July 16, 2007 - Former California Seismic Safety Commissioner Endorses 9/11 Truth Movement featured the statement of J. Marx Ayres, former member of the National Institute of Sciences Building Safety Council and former member of the California Seismic Safety Commission.
Critically important questions about 9/11 still remain unanswered six years after the terrible events of that day. As the above statements of senior government engineers and scientists demonstrate, the need for a new thorough, and independent investigation of 9/11 is not a matter of partisan politics.  It is a matter of the utmost importance for America’s security and the future of the entire world. see http://patriotsquestion911.com/

.

'