22  Jim Hutchinson Two Tomorrows The Happy Fox & Lady Belinda

Lady Belinda The Happy Fox Page List

 

Environmental Maths

November 2000. The United Nation's (UN) Climate Change Conference dismissed the lunatic claim "Nuclear Power could reduce greenhouse gases."  
Nuclear apologists used to claim nuclear power delivered thirty-two (32) million kilowatt hours per ton of uranium ore.

Independent (honest) research has forced Nuclear apologists to reduce this claim to nine-and-a-half (9.5) million kilowatt hours per ton. Not surprisingly the apologists failed to adjust their estimates for Carbon Emissions in their fake claim that "nuclear power reduces global warming."

For a proposed life of 30 years; a nuclear reactor needs tens of thousands of fuel rods. One hundred tons of uranium ore has to be mined and then crushed to extract enough Uranium 235 & 238 atoms to fill one, two foot tall, two inch thick, fuel rod. 

Consider the carbon dioxide emissions of petrol, diesel, thick oil and coal fired power plants involved in mining and processing the necessary trillions of tons of uranium ore.

Consider the carbon dioxide emissions of petrol, diesel, thick oil and coal fired power plants involved in the transport & process of washing & crushing the ore.
Consider the carbon dioxide emissions involved in smelting and machining the special alloys for the fuel rods.
Consider the carbon dioxide emissions of coal-fired steel mills fabricating the top quality steel reactor, with its steel containment building and endless miles of stainless steel pipes.
[Image]

Consider the carbon dioxide emissions of petrol, diesel, thick oil and coal fired power plants involved in building, and then the necessary never-ending, maintenance and monitoring of the steel lined cooling tanks and steel lined cooling pools for the high level nuclear waste the reactor produces.

 Consider the carbon dioxide emissions of the coal-fired steel mills fabricating and building and running, and then the diesel plant dioxide emissions involved in the packaging plants for the dry and intermediate level waste the reactor produces.
 

 

Consider the carbon dioxide emissions involved in building and then the never-ending maintenance and monitoring of dry and intermediate nuclear waste stores.
Consider the carbon dioxide emissions involved in building and never-ending maintenance and monitoring of the massive, concrete cell, waste dumps for millions of tons of low level waste the reactor produces.
Consider the carbon dioxide emissions involved
in rail and road transport of the various types of nuclear waste.
Consider also the carbon dioxide emissions involved in
24-7-365 reactor and waste tank and waste pool refrigeration.

An attack on one of these nuclear doom boxes below would make 9/11 look like a bicycle accident

Consider also the carbon dioxide emissions involved in making and moving these  mobile Chernobyl's around your country.

 

 

 

 

 


carbon dioxide emissions involved in  shipping potential's Chernobyl's around Britain are, in themselves, a crime against Britain.

above The weekly nuclear waste train travelling unguarded
through Merry England

After a nuclear reactor is shut down it needs a 30 - 40 year period of hideously expensive "care and maintenance"! Followed by many more carbon dioxide emissions in the many years of the eventual dismantling, encapsulating and storing of the highly radioactive reactor and its 1,000 odd tons of ancillary metalwork and some 2,000 tons of radioactive graphiteIn short. Any new nuclear power station, barring accident or attack, will increase the price of your electricity and then cost your kids and grandkids more and more each generation in nuclear waste storage costs.

By the time a hideously dangerous nuclear power station is finally buried (where it will poison the earth for eternity) it would have used trillions of hours of electricity and motive power provided by coal and oil causing more carbon dioxide emissions than building a infinitely cheaper, infinitely safer, clean-burn-coal-fired power station and operating it for 30 years.

The royals (known) 77 Billion investment in Arabian oil wells and their (known) $2 Trillion investment in uranium mines tells you all you need to know the Queen's oil and nuclear energy policy - Profit First People Last.

[Image][Image]

Two hideously expensive nuclear cooling pools.
Each pool contains enough poison to kill everyone in Britain. Anyone wanting to build any more of these Targets of Mass Destruction can only be considered educationally sub normal. A small nuclear device triggered at a British Nuclear power station would see the wiped off international money markets. Not that that would worry the inbred Establishment who have always kept their ill-gotten gains in gold offshore.

Iraq costing US Taxpayer $330 MILLION PER DAY 
CNN Situation Room October 22, 2007

The US and British taxpayers will pay at least $10 Trillion for allowing Bush to get away with 9/11 and believing the WMD lies. And that's before we consider the price of energy, gas (petrol) and electricity will soar in 2008.

Her Majesty's Government: Not Yours

Given cheap power British Industry can produce the cheapest, and the finest, ships, planes, trains, cars, machine-tools, electrical goods and computers in the world. Unemployment and the crime it causes can be become a memory. But not until we get rid of the nuclear-vested royal family. While North Sea oil profits were rolling into Her Majesty's Treasury. Britain could easily have developed cheap power for industry. With cheap power our heavy industries, shipbuilding ect., would have expanded - not disappeared. North Sea Oil profits ended up in the royals tax haven accounts.
British workers should never have become jobless, let alone homeless. Her Majesty's "Government" made it happen. 
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUfJXdMIRGw                                                                            

 

Back Home Next

Page List